Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
How NY Courts Find Copyright Preemption of State Law Claims
Under §301 of the U.S. Copyright Act, state law claims that are "equivalent" to exclusive rights in copyrights granted by federal law are preempted by the federal statute. To survive preemption, courts consider whether a state law claim in a lawsuit has an "extra element" that qualitatively distinguishes it from a federal copyright claim. Courts typically find state law claims such as breach of contract have an extra element. Other state law claims, such as conversion, get varying court determinations as to whether they are preempted under §301.
In Laws v. Sony Music Entertainment Inc., 448 F.3d 1134 (9th Cir. 2006) — a precedential ruling on whether federal copyright law preempted a state right-of-publicity claim over use of a singer's voice in a sound recording sample — Debra Laws had signed to Elektra/Asylum Records in the 1970s. Elektra/Asylum owned the copyrights in Laws' recordings. She later filed a right-of-publicity suit under California statutory and common law, after the label issued a license years later for use of a sample containing her voice from her 1980 recording "Very Special" in Jennifer Lopez's 2002 recording and music video "All I Have." The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided Laws' "right of publicity claim is based exclusively on what she claims is an unauthorized duplication of her vocal performance of the song 'Very Special.' Although California law recognizes an assertable interest in the publicity associated with one's voice, we think it is clear that federal copyright law preempts a claim alleging misappropriation of one's voice when the entirety of the allegedly misappropriated vocal performance is contained within a copyrighted medium."
What is the view of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on the preemption issue? On this, two 2021 New York federal court decisions are worth noting. One of these cases involved a voice preemption claim in a California right of publicity context, the other whether an unjust enrichment claim was preempted in a copyright infringement action over use of the plaintiff's vocal arrangements.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?