Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

IP News

By Howard Shire and Shaleen Patel
August 01, 2021

Federal Circuit, Citing Forum-Shopping, Transfers Patent Cases to California

In re: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al.

The Federal Circuit granted mandamus petitions filed by Samsung Electronics and LG Electronics, ordering patent cases pending against them in the Western District of Texas be transferred to the Northern District of California. The court relied on precedent discounting pre-litigation attempts by plaintiffs to forum shop by manipulating jurisdiction or venue. The court held that such attempts should also be disregarded in determining the most appropriate venue.

Ikorongo Technology LLC (Ikorongo Tech) owned the asserted patents. A month before filing the complaint against Samsung and LG in the Western District of Texas, Ikorongo Tech created Ikorongo Texas LLC (collectively, Ikorongo), a formally unrelated company owned by the same five directors. Both Ikorongo companies also operated out of the same North Carolina office. Ikorongo Tech assigned to Ikorongo Texas the exclusive right to sue and collect damages on the patents within specified parts of the Western District of Texas, while retaining the rights to the patents in the rest of the country. Ikorongo Texas then sued Samsung and LG in the Western District of Texas; Ikorongo Tech joined the suits one day after the initial complaints were filed. The complaints generally accused patent infringement stemming from the functionality of certain third-party apps on mobile devices made by Samsung and LG.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

"Holy Fair Use, Batman": Copyright, Fair Use and the Dark Knight Image

The copyright for the original versions of Winnie the Pooh and Mickey Mouse have expired. Now, members of the public can create — and are busy creating — their own works based on these beloved characters. Suppose, though, we want to tell stories using Batman for which the copyright does not expire until 2035. We'll review five hypothetical works inspired by the original Batman comic and analyze them under fair use.