Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Legislature Modifies HSTPA to Assist Co-ops

By Jeffrey Schwartz and Mark Hakim
August 01, 2021

Two years ago, on June 14, 2019, New York lawmakers approved, and Governor Cuomo signed into law, the "Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act of 2019" (the Act), which contained a series of laws affecting all rentals within the State of New York. The Act was intended to provide safeguards and additional protections to tenants in rental properties. As we had previously predicted, among its many sweeping changes, the Act had an unintended and profound impact on the thousands of cooperative corporations located in New York. Boards of directors and their managing agents were also forced to deal with the uncertainty of many of the Act's provisions, often erring on the side of inaction. However, on June 10, 2021, New York's lawmakers approved amendments to the Act, exempting cooperative corporations from some of the most onerous provisions, and clarifying others. Once the new legislation is signed into law by the Governor, it will not only be a huge victory for the thousands of cooperative apartment buildings but also for many potential purchasers who were unable to purchase in those buildings as a result of the Act.

Cooperative corporations, unlike condominiums, rely on a landlord-tenant relationship under a proprietary lease (which governs the occupancy of the apartment). As a result, boards of directors are considered landlords and purchaser-shareholders are considered tenants, though, in each case, not in the traditional sense. Cooperative corporations are also not set up as a for-profit business, rather they are private housing corporations intended generally for occupancy by its shareholders and are governed by a proprietary lease and by-laws which sets forth the rights of each party and terms of governance.

When the Act was signed into law, cooperative corporations and their managing agents, with decades of experience, were forced to pivot and operate contrary to the many years of established law and practice. One such instance was with applications from potential purchasers, who apply to the board of directors seeking its consent to purchase. Among the litany of requested items, and to ensure that each applicant has the financial ability to pay its obligations when due (to the cooperative, a lender and/or otherwise), a board will request detailed financial information regarding the applicant(s). Sometimes, particularly with first time purchasers, the financials are less than stellar, albeit due to poor, little or no credit history, a change in employment, or otherwise. To overcome these issues, as has been common practice, boards looking to approve an otherwise viable candidate would request maintenance in escrow (in some instances as much as two years), as additional security. Under the Act, such security was limited to just one month's maintenance and no board could accept prepaid maintenance either, thus potentially reducing the number of qualified cooperative buyers and contrary of the purpose of the Act. Under the new legislation, additional security (including maintenance escrows) and even prepaid rent is again permitted for purchasers of owner-occupied apartments, thus boards can now approve purchasers whose financials were otherwise borderline and whom otherwise may not have been approved.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.