Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Authority to File Chapter 11: A Matter of Contract or Public Policy?
If you think public policy favoring the freedom to file a Chapter 11 trumps the freedom to negotiate specific restrictions to such a filing, think again. On July 22, 2021, Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey dismissed the Chapter 11 case of 3P Hightstown, LLC, finding that the debtor lacked the proper authority to commence its Chapter 11 due to its failure to comply with its LLC agreement. Unwilling to follow Judge Walrath's approach in a COVID-related Delaware Chapter 11 case, Judge Kaplan concluded that the governing LLC agreement — which contained a provision restricting the debtor's ability to commence a bankruptcy case — was not void as contrary to public policy. In making its determination, the court provided analysis that is helpful and instructive to anyone considering filing a bankruptcy petition for an LLC, particularly where the LLC is organized under Delaware law. This article explores Judge Kaplan's analysis and the basis for his opinion.
Background
On April 9, 2021, 3P Hightstown, LLC filed a voluntary chapter 11 bankruptcy petition. Shortly thereafter, Hightstown Enterprises LLC, an entity claiming to be the preferred member of the debtor via an assignment, filed a motion seeking dismissal of the debtor's bankruptcy case. Specifically, Hightstown Enterprises asserted that, pursuant to the debtor's Limited Liability Company Agreement, the debtor lacked authority to file a bankruptcy petition absent certain prerequisites which had not occurred. The debtor opposed the motion.
Debtor's Authority to File
The United States Supreme Court, in Price v. Gurney, 324 U.S. 100, 104 (1945), noted that, with respect to corporations, the entity vested with "the power of management" has the authority necessary to file a bankruptcy petition. If an entity without the "power of management" files a bankruptcy petition, the bankruptcy case must be dismissed. This principle also applies to cases filed by limited liability companies.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.