Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In the past year, the Federal Circuit has repeatedly required the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas to transfer patent infringement suits from that district to more convenient venues, and in doing so it has provided increasingly specific — and often pointed — guidance to courts and litigants on the appropriate analysis for transfer motions.
For example, in the November 2020 ruling in In re Apple Inc., 979 F.3d 1332 (Fed. Cir. 2020), the Federal Circuit chastised the Western District for "barrel[ing] ahead" with the merits of a case while a transfer motion sat pending, and it issued a writ of mandamus requiring that the case be transferred to the Northern District of California. In In re TracFone Wireless, 852 F. App'x 537 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 20, 2021), the court again identified several errors in the district court's analysis and ordered a transfer.
In two recent opinions — one published and therefore binding on future panels — the Federal Circuit has granted two more mandamus petitions filed by technology companies seeking transfers from the Western District of Texas to California. Those rulings — In re Hulu, No. 2021-142, 2021 WL 3278194 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 2, 2021), and the published opinion In re Samsung Electronics Co., 2 F.4th 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2021) — provide additional guidance on several recurring issues that defendants, and courts, should be especially attuned to. [Editor's Note: Samsung Electronics was summarized in the IP News section last month).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
The copyright for the original versions of Winnie the Pooh and Mickey Mouse have expired. Now, members of the public can create — and are busy creating — their own works based on these beloved characters. Suppose, though, we want to tell stories using Batman for which the copyright does not expire until 2035. We'll review five hypothetical works inspired by the original Batman comic and analyze them under fair use.