Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Federal Circuit Provides Guidance on IP Case Transfer Motions
In the past year, the Federal Circuit has repeatedly required the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas to transfer patent infringement suits from that district to more convenient venues, and in doing so it has provided increasingly specific — and often pointed — guidance to courts and litigants on the appropriate analysis for transfer motions.
For example, in the November 2020 ruling in In re Apple Inc., 979 F.3d 1332 (Fed. Cir. 2020), the Federal Circuit chastised the Western District for "barrel[ing] ahead" with the merits of a case while a transfer motion sat pending, and it issued a writ of mandamus requiring that the case be transferred to the Northern District of California. In In re TracFone Wireless, 852 F. App'x 537 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 20, 2021), the court again identified several errors in the district court's analysis and ordered a transfer.
In two recent opinions — one published and therefore binding on future panels — the Federal Circuit has granted two more mandamus petitions filed by technology companies seeking transfers from the Western District of Texas to California. Those rulings — In re Hulu, No. 2021-142, 2021 WL 3278194 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 2, 2021), and the published opinion In re Samsung Electronics Co., 2 F.4th 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2021) — provide additional guidance on several recurring issues that defendants, and courts, should be especially attuned to. [Editor's Note: Samsung Electronics was summarized in the IP News section last month).
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.