Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Under §301 of the U.S. Copyright Act, state law claims that are "equivalent" to exclusive rights in copyrights granted by federal law are preempted by the federal statute. To survive preemption, courts consider whether a state law claim in a lawsuit has an "extra element" that qualitatively distinguishes it from a federal copyright claim. Courts typically find that state law claims, such as breach of contract, have an extra element. Other state law claims, such as conversion, get varying court determinations as to whether they are preempted under §301.
In Laws v. Sony Music Entertainment Inc., 448 F.3d 1134 (9th Cir. 2006) — a precedential ruling on whether federal copyright law preempted a state right-of-publicity claim over use of a singer's voice in a sound recording sample — Debra Laws had assigned to Elektra/Asylum Records in the 1970s Elektra/Asylum owned the copyrights in Laws' recordings. She later filed a right-of-publicity suit under California statutory and common law, after the label issued a license years later for use of a sample containing her voice from her 1980 recording "Very Special" in Jennifer Lopez's 2002 recording and music video "All I Have." The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided Laws' "right of publicity claim is based exclusively on what she claims is an unauthorized duplication of her vocal performance of the song 'Very Special.' Although California law recognizes an assertable interest in the publicity associated with one's voice, we think it is clear that federal copyright law preempts a claim alleging misappropriation of one's voice when the entirety of the allegedly misappropriated vocal performance is contained within a copyrighted medium."
What is the view of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit's view on the preemption issue? Two 2021 New York federal court decisions are worth noting. One of these cases involved a voice preemption claim in a California right of publicity context, the other whether an unjust enrichment claim was preempted in a copyright infringement action over use of the plaintiff's vocal arrangements.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.