Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

How Will Courts Determine Business Expense Legitimacy Under SEC's New Disgorgement Authority?

By Jorge deNeve, Michael Simeone and David Cohen
September 01, 2021

As courts, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and defendants wrangle with new limits on the Commission's authority to seek disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, one question has dominated: How will courts determine which business expenses are legitimate and which are not? Answering that question will force defendants facing SEC enforcement actions to focus on demonstrating the legitimacy of expenses in developing their litigation strategies.

Over the past four years, Congress and the Supreme Court have reshaped the SEC's authority to obtain disgorgement of ill-gotten gains. The Supreme Court's decision in Kokesh v. SEC, 137 S. Ct. 1635 (2017) — which addressed the statute of limitations for the SEC's ability to obtain disgorgement — left open the question of whether the SEC even had authority to seek disgorgement. The Supreme Court took up that issue when, in 2019, it granted review in Liu v. SEC, 140 S. Ct. 1936, 1940 (2020). The Supreme Court's decision in June 2020 ultimately upheld the SEC's authority to obtain disgorgement but also narrowed the circumstances in which the SEC can seek it. And earlier this year in the National Defense Authorization Act, Congress passed legislation expressly reaffirming the SEC's ability to obtain disgorgement.

Of these developments, Liu's decision that the SEC can seek disgorgement only of "net profits" has been the thorniest for practitioners and the courts to apply. In limiting disgorgement to "net profits," the Supreme Court held that courts must deduct "legitimate expenses" from any disgorgement amount. At the same time, the court noted that "expenses" may be "wrongful gains under another name." This distinction has opened a battleground over what expenses courts should and should not consider legitimate.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies Image

Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.