Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Second Circuit Expands Federal Class Actions for Mortgagors
In Maddox v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon Trust Co., N.A., 997 F.3d 436, the Second Circuit recently held that individuals have Article III standing to seek statutory damages for a bank's violation of Real Property Law (RPL) §275 and New Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law (RPAPL) §1921 (together, New York's Mortgage-Satisfaction-Recording Statutes). The Second Circuit held that, despite no "actual injury," violations of New York statutory law constitute a concrete and particularized harm giving rise to Article III standing. This is important because under New York rules, a plaintiff could not bring a class action in state court under New York's Mortgage-Satisfaction-Recording Statutes. Because the Second Circuit held that a bare violation of New York's Mortgage-Satisfaction-Recording Statutes without a demonstration of actual injury conferred federal jurisdiction, a mortgagor now has the ability to bring a class action in federal court. Thus, statutes designed to be merely remedial in nature can now be used punitively against lenders and servicers.
The Plaintiffs, Sandra Maddox and Tometta Maddox Holley, obtained a loan with Aegis Mortgage Corporation, which was memorialized by a mortgage secured against a property located in Buffalo, New York. The mortgage was, thereafter, assigned to Bank of New York Mellon (BNY). On or about Oct. 5, 2014, the loan was paid off and the debt discharged. BNY filed a satisfaction of mortgage on Sept. 22, 2015.
New York's mortgage-satisfaction-recording statutes require a mortgage lender to file a certificate of discharge/satisfaction of mortgage within thirty (30) days of full repayment of the debt. Failure to present a certificate of discharge within certain time frames results in the mortgagee being liable to the mortgagor in monetary form. Specifically, RPL §275 and RPAPL §1921 both mandate that a mortgagee present a satisfaction of mortgage/certificate of discharge to the Clerk's Office within 30 days of the payment of the debt and: 1) if not filed within 30 days, the mortgagee shall be liable to the mortgagor in the amount of $500.00; 2) if not filed within 60 days, the mortgagee shall be liable to the mortgagor in the amount of $1,000.00; 3) if not filed within 90 days, the mortgagee shall be liable to the mortgagor in the amount of $1,500.00.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.