Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Residential Board of Millennium Point v. Condominium Board of Millennium Point NYLJ 8/9/21, p. 19, col. 5 AppDiv, First Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In an action by the residential condominium against the commercial condominium and the combined condominium alleging violations of the ground lease and the condominium documents, all parties appealed from Supreme Court's order dismissing some, but not all, of the claims. The Appellate division modified to reinstate two claims, but otherwise affirmed.
The subject building includes a luxury hotel on floors 1-14 and residential apartments on floors 15-39. The building is governed by three boards, one for matters concerning the residential units, a second for matters concerning the commercial units, and a third for matters concerning both residential and commercial units. The condominium's offering plan provided that the hotel would be operated by the Ritz Carlton Hotel Company. The condominium sponsor held title to a ground lease, and the ground lease required that any hotel would be one with the "highest rating by a nationally recognized rating service." When the Ritz Carlton stopped operating the hotel, the new owner of the hotel units sought to convert them to residential units, but were thwarted by the terms of the ground lease. The new owners then opened a hotel that, according to the residential owners, did not comply with the standards of the ground lease or the condominium documents. The residential condominium and individual residential owners brought this action raising 15 claims against a variety of legal entities. Supreme Court dismissed many of the claims, but denied motions to dismiss with respect to claims for breach of the condominium declaration and bylaws, for breach of the ground lease, and for violation of Real Property Law section 339-j.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?