Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On July 28, 2021, certain members of Congress introduced the Nondebtor Release Prohibition Act of 2021 (S. 2497) (NRPA), which proposes to amend the Bankruptcy Code to, among other things, restrict courts' ability to approve third-party releases of nondebtors and related injunctions under plans of reorganization or otherwise in Chapter 11 cases. Although the NRPA was introduced in response to testimony criticizing the third-party releases and injunctions proposed in the USA Gymnastics cases and Purdue Pharma cases, the NRPA's provisions are not limited to the mass tort context, and, if enacted, would have significant implications for all Chapter 11 cases. The authors submit that while some of the concerns regarding nonconsensual third-party releases may be valid, the NRPA goes too far in limiting what can, in the right circumstances, be a valuable tool in restructurings.
|Third-party releases, i.e., releases of nondebtor individuals and entities from claims of creditors and other third parties, and injunctions barring released third-party claims, have become increasingly prevalent in Chapter 11 cases. Releases and corresponding injunctions are key to obtaining funding and other contributions to the restructuring process from nondebtors who might be concerned about potential liability arising from their interactions or relationship with the debtors. These provisions tend to be heavily-negotiated and litigated in the Chapter 11 plan context. Yet this practice remains controversial, hence the proposal of the NRPA.
Courts distinguish between consensual and nonconsensual third-party releases. Consensual releases are generally viewed as permissible, but courts have reached varying conclusions as to whether the indication of consent must be affirmative or can be implied from inaction such as a failure to submit a ballot or "opt out" when voting on a plan. See, e.g., In re SunEdison, 576 B.R. 453, 458-61 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2017) (discussing differing views). Federal circuits are split regarding the permissibility of nonconsensual third-party releases, but a majority of circuits permit them under certain circumstances. Compare, e.g., Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch v. Metromedia Fiber Network (In re Metromedia Fiber Network), 416 F.3d 136, 141-42 (2d Cir. 2005) (discussing circuit split and siding with courts permitting third-party releases), with, e.g., Resorts Int'l v. Lowenschuss (In re Lowenschuss), 67 F.3d 1394, 1401-02 (9th Cir. 1995) (holding that 11 U.S.C. §524(e) precludes bankruptcy courts from discharging liabilities of nondebtors). While courts permitting nonconsensual third-party releases differ in the particular fact-specific tests they apply in determining whether such relief is justified, they all treat such releases as requiring heightened scrutiny for approval.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.