Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The COVID-19 pandemic's immediate effect on commercial leasing was obvious. Businesses, compelled by executive orders to reduce in-person operations or even to cease operation altogether, looked for relief from their rental obligations. Commercial landlords, who were subject to a state-ordered eviction moratoriums but no corresponding state-ordered mortgage forbearance, faced the prospect of losing the income they needed to support ongoing expenses such as mortgage payments, taxes, insurance, and maintenance costs. Landlords, tenants, and insurance companies are still negotiating and litigating over how that financial impact should be apportioned.
But the pandemic is also having a longer-term impact on the way commercial leases are negotiated. Whereas in the past parties have not wanted to spend a significant amount of time discussing and negotiating events that seemed unlikely to occur, post-pandemic lease negotiations are placing a greater emphasis on seeking protection against such events. This article is the first in series that will examine specific aspects of this shift. Its focus is on casualty provisions.
|Standard casualty provisions in commercial leases often leave the term "casualty" undefined, loosely describing such events — which often result in a rent abatement or termination right — as a fire or "other casualty" that renders the premises "uninhabitable" (or "untenantable," "inaccessible" "unusable," or a similar descriptor), in whole or in part. Claims that the pandemic (and associated restrictions on business operations) constituted a casualty that would relieve a tenant of its rent obligations during the period when the tenant was not able to use its premises have met with mixed results in the courts.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.