Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
As Federal Antitrust Prosecutions Rise, Potential Criminal Pitfalls Loom for HR Professionals
On July 9, 2021, President Joe Biden issued his "Executive Order on Promoting Competition in the American Economy" (EO), establishing his administration as one that will prioritize the importance of competition in the workforce. See, White House Exec. Order on Promoting Competition in the American Economy (Jul. 9, 2021). The EO strikes the same chord as a recent Tweet from President Biden which states: "It's simple: companies should have to compete for workers just like they compete for customers. We should get rid of non-compete clauses and no-poaching agreements that do nothing but suppress wages." See, Joe Biden (@JoeBiden), Twitter (Dec. 23, 2019, 7:05 PM). Clearly, the Biden administration seeks to position itself as one that will crack down on employers' attempts to limit their employees' mobility and pay through allegedly non-competitive measures.
We have begun to see the fruits of this aggressive new approach. This year, the Department of Justice (DOJ) filed the first-ever criminal prosecutions of employers and individuals allegedly involved in inter-business agreements to avoid raising employees' pay. In January 2021, the DOJ's Antitrust Division brought charges in its first prosecution of an employer alleged to be engaging in a so-called "illegal no-poach agreement." See, Siri Bulusu, Antitrust Regulators Eye Criminal Enforcement in No-Poach Deals, Bloomberg Law (May 17, 2021, 6:30 AM). Less than one month earlier, the DOJ brought its first criminal charges against an employer alleged to be involved in "wage-fixing." These two cases come just over four years after the DOJ released Antitrust Guidance for Human Resource Professionals. See, U.S. Dep't of Justice, Antitrust Div. & Fed. Trade Comm'n, Antitrust Guidance for Human Resource Professionals (Oct. 2016). That 2016 guidance cautioned employers to expect criminal prosecutions for restrictive covenants that did not protect a legitimate business interest. Id.
|A New Kind of Prosecution
Generally speaking, what the government calls a "no-poach agreement" is an agreement between two or more companies not to compete for each other's employees. See, Alex Malyshev & Jeffrey S. Boxer, With DOJ's Focus on Wage Fixing and No Poach Agreements, Non-Compete and Antitrust Laws Collide, Reuters (Aug. 23, 2021, 6:51 AM). Similarly, a "wage-fixing agreement" is an agreement between two or more companies to set employees' salaries at a certain level or within a certain range. Id. Until the two aforementioned cases, the DOJ (along with state attorneys general) enforced perceived illegality with respect to no-poach and wage-fixing arrangements via civil penalties. The criminal prosecution of that conduct represents a significant shift when compared to how these labor agreements were regulated in the past. See, Bulusu, supra note 3.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
How Secure Is the AI System Your Law Firm Is Using?
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
COVID-19 and Lease Negotiations: Early Termination Provisions
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
Pleading Importation: ITC Decisions Highlight Need for Adequate Evidentiary Support
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
Authentic Communications Today Increase Success for Value-Driven Clients
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.