Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In the past few months, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has placed a renewed emphasis on corporate accountability. Particularly, it has announced exacting new disclosure requirements for companies to receive cooperation credit in any government investigation. While the DOJ does not require the disclosure of privileged materials for cooperation credit, and will not explicitly ask for a waiver, there is often a tension as to where companies may draw the line.
This article explores a key consideration for companies under government investigation: whether voluntary disclosure of privileged information in an effort to obtain cooperation credit waives the privilege vis-à-vis third parties in subsequent litigation. Given the prevalence of follow-on civil litigation for certain types of investigations, the ability to preserve the privilege under the "selective waiver doctrine" may be of critical importance. This article analyzes various views on the selective waiver doctrine by federal courts in different jurisdictions and offers best practices for cooperating with the government in a manner that best protects the privilege.
|The DOJ is once again highly focused on pursuing investigations of corporations with an emphasis on individual accountability. Notably, on Oct. 5, 2021, John Carlin, Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General, announced that the DOJ will significantly surge resources for corporate enforcement. Carlin specifically mentioned a new squad of FBI agents that will be designated to work full time within the DOJ's Fraud Section as well as increased enforcement of sanctions and export controls. On Oct. 28, 2021, Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco, delivering the keynote address at the ABA annual National Institute on White Collar Crime, stated that the DOJ "will not hesitate to take action when necessary to combat corporate wrongdoing."
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.