Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Southern District of New York, as part of an unresolved 14-year saga in the Village of Pomona, New York, found that the Plaintiffs, who are seeking to construct a Rabbinical College, had brought an action against the Village that is not ripe for adjudication (No.20-CV6158(KMK), appeal filed Oct. 22, 2021).
The Plaintiffs seek to develop a Rabbinical College to train Rabbis who will conduct Rabbinic Courts, utilized by Orthodox Jewish individuals. This action derives from Plaintiffs' desire to prevent the Village's enforcement of zoning provisions contained in two Local Laws. The Village has refused Plaintiffs' request to repeal the laws. "The laws prohibit the construction of non-accredited educational institutions and housing for students with families on the Subject Property. Specifically, Plaintiffs challenge Local Law No. 1 of 2001 and Local Law No. 5 of 2004 (the "Challenged Laws") with respect to 'educational institutions' and 'dormitories' of such institutions." Before the Court was Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. The Court granted the motion to dismiss and denied the injunction.
The property at issue is zoned residential, permitting educational uses by special permit. The local law defines Educational Institutions as "[a]ny private or religious elementary, junior high or high school, college, graduate [,] or post-graduate school conducting a full-time curriculum of instruction … accredited by the New York State Education Department or similar recognized accrediting agency," Such uses require ten acre lots and permit dormitories, provided rooms open to common hallways, along with shared cooking and dining facilities. "Single family, two-family and/or multi-family dwelling units other than as described above shall not be considered to be dormitories or part of dormitories."
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Making partner isn't cheap, and the cost is more than just the years of hard work and stress that associates put in as they reach for the brass ring.