Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Young Men's Christian Association v. Town of Milo, 2021 WL 4452322, U.S. Dist. Ct, W.D.N.Y (Wolford, C.J.)
In an action by the YMCA alleging violation of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA} and state law, the town moved to dismiss. The court denied the motion, holding that the YMCA had adequately alleged a RLUIPA violation, but directed the parties to file memoranda explaining why the state law claims should not be dismissed without prejudice and remanded to state court,
The YMCA has long operated a summer camp in the town as a conforming use. In 2018, the town planning board granted the UMCA a special use permit approving expansion of the camp, including construction of a new 40 by 80 foot barn building which doubled the camp's capacity. In 2019, when the YMCA hosted a nonprofit fundraiser auction for the county arts center in the Barn Building, the town issued a notice of violation, contending that the event violated the special use permit. The town explained that the permit did not allow art sales, rehearsal dinners, or weekend spas. The YMCA appealed to the ZBA, which upheld the notice of violation. The YMCA then filed a state court complaint combining an article 78 challenge to the ZBA's determination with a RLUIPA claim. The article 78 challenge asserted that the auction and similar uses constituted permissible accessory uses under state law. The town removed to federal court and moved to dismiss.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Making partner isn't cheap, and the cost is more than just the years of hard work and stress that associates put in as they reach for the brass ring.