Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Paulonis v. 287 Associates, L.P., NYLJ 10/8/21 p. 22, col 3, AppDiv, Second Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In tenant's action against landlord for fraud and rent overcharge, tenant appealed from Supreme Court's judgment, after a nonjury trial, dismissing tenant's demand for treble damages. The Appellate Division affirmed, holding that the overcharge was not willful.
Landlord of a multi-family building in Brooklyn imposed charges in leases designated as "421-a Tax Exemption Program, 2.2% charge." Tenant brought this action for fraud and rent overcharge, contending that the charge was unauthorized and seeking treble damages and a calculation of lawful rent under DHCR's default formula. Supreme Court determined that landlord did not intentionally act to defraud and determine that the demand for treble damages should be dismissed. Tenant appealed.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.