Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Matter of Singleton v. Morton NYLJ 11/12/21, p. 18, col. 1 AppDiv, First Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In a petition to set aside a co-op election, defenders of the election appealed from Supreme Court's grant of the petition. The Appellate Division affirmed, holding that the undisputed facts established that there was no quorum at the shareholders' meeting.
The subject building is organized as a co-op under the Private Housing Finance Law. The parties agreed that a majority of shareholders were necessary to constitute a quorum. Deceased shareholders had owned four apartments, and at the time of the election, no estates had been formed and no administrators appointed for the decedents. A fifth apartment had been occupied by an heir of a decedent, but the heir had been evicted and the co-op was in possession of the apartment, but there was dispute about whether the shares had reverted to the co-op. At the time of the meeting, there were 30 other holders of outstanding shares. At most, 17 shareholders attended the meeting.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.