Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Fourth Circuit: Shareholders Face High Bar In Demonstrating Scienter
A recent decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit analyzed the "scienter" requirement that a shareholder must meet to prevail under the federal securities laws in showing that the company or its executives fraudulently induced the shareholder to buy or retain shares. KBC Asset Management v. DXC Technology Co., No. 20-1718 (4th Cir., Dec. 1, 2021). The company or executives act with "scienter" only when they have a certain fraudulent state of mind, intending to mislead or being extremely careless about misleading shareholders. As the Fourth Circuit decision shows, shareholders must meet a high bar in demonstrating scienter to avoid early dismissal of the case. The decision also shows the fact-intensive approach courts use to distinguish fraudulent statements from those that, even if mistaken, were made innocently.
|KBC Asset Management Background
DXC is a publicly traded IT company. Throughout 2017, the company successfully used cost-cutting measures to achieve its financial goals. In February 2018, DXC issued a press release touting its continued financial success. By November 2018, however, it had revised its projected revenue guidance to shareholders downward by around $800 million. The company's share price dropped as a result.
The plaintiffs in this case were a group of shareholders who had acquired shares in DXC between February and November 2018. The plaintiffs alleged that the company knew, contrary to its public statements in February 2018, that its cost-cutting measures during the course of 2018 would inhibit its ability to generate revenue. The plaintiffs claimed DXC and its two principal executives fraudulently induced the plaintiffs to acquire stock through its material misstatements and omissions about the company's financial health. The plaintiffs brought federal securities fraud claims against the company and the two executives under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.