Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

IP News

By Howard Shire and Shaleen Patel
February 01, 2022

Evolusion Concepts, Inc. v. HOC Events, Inc., No. 2021-1963 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 14, 2022)

Evolusion owns U.S. Patent No. 8,7565,845, titled "Method and Device for Converting Firearm with Detachable Magazine to a Firearm with Fixed Magazine." Evolusion sued Juggernaut, alleging various theories of infringement of several claims. The Central District of California granted Juggernaut summary judgment of non-infringement, reasoning that the term "magazine catch bar" in the asserted claims must exclude a factory-installed magazine catch bar. The district court held that claim construction precludes literal infringement because Juggernaut's products use the factory-installed magazine catch bar. The district court also determined that Juggernaut did not infringe under the doctrine of equivalents. The Federal Circuit reversed, holding that the term "magazine catch bar" in the asserted claims includes a factory-installed magazine catch bar.

Part of the lawsuit was based on Juggernaut's manufacture and sale of its "Hellfighter Mod Kits," which convert a firearm with a detachable magazine into a firearm with a fixed magazine. On appeal, the Federal Circuit reversed the district court's grant of summary judgment, construing the term "magazine catch bar" "according to its ordinary meaning," which includes a factory-installed magazine catch bar. The panel reasoned that the claims and specification required removing the factory-installed magazine catch bar, before later installing "a magazine catch bar." Because a specific catch bar was not required, the court reasoned that "the invention thus involves removing and installing assemblies of parts — not only magazine catch bars." (emphasis added). Thus, the "ordinary meaning of the claim language allows the [same] factory-installed magazine catch bar to be removed … and reused" later in the claim while still satisfying the claim language.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.