Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Under the federal mail and wire fraud statutes, it is a crime to "obtain[] money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises," or to deprive someone of the "intangible right of honest services." 18 U.S.C. §§1341, 1343, 1346. The scope of these prohibitions has expanded over time. This expansion has been met with infrequent, but significant, pushback from the courts. Perhaps most prominent is the line of Supreme Court decisions which initially resisted and later narrowed the scope of "honest services" fraud. See, McNally v. United States, 483 U.S. 350 (1987); Skilling v. United States, 130 S. Ct. 2896 (2010); McDonnell v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 2355 (2016).
In Kelly v. United States, 140 S. Ct. 1565 (2020), the Supreme Court turned its attention to a fraud scheme premised on "obtaining money or property." Id. at 1572. In that case, the Supreme Court rejected the government's theory of "property." A unanimous court held that a scheme was not intended to "obtain property" when its objective was to misuse government officials' regulatory powers, or when monetary losses were "incidental," and not the actual object of the scheme.
Following Kelly, the meaning of property was central to two high-profile cases in the Second Circuit. In United States v. Blaszczak, 947 F.3d 19 (2d Cir. 2019), vacated, 141 S. Ct. 1040 (2021), the government and defendants addressed whether the misuse of confidential information concerning future government regulations amounted to obtaining property. In United States v. Gatto, 986 F.3d 104 (2d Cir. 2021), cert. denied, 2021 WL 5869415 (Dec. 13, 2021), the Second Circuit addressed the circumstances under which a monetary loss—in this case, by universities that extended athletic scholarships—should be seen as "incidental" to the charged scheme.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.