Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Update on Bankruptcy Appellate Practice Part Three — Finality

By Michael L. Cook
February 01, 2022

This installment of our appellate practice series reviews recent cases addressing the appellate jurisdiction of district courts and the courts of appeals, referred to as the "finality" doctrine. The relevant sections of the Judicial Code — §§157, 158, 1298 and 1292 — seem straightforward and clear. As shown below, though, the courts have often been inconsistent in applying the statute. (See Part One: Appellate Standing of this series in the December 2021 issue, and Part 2: Equitable Mootness in the January 2022 issue.)

Introductory Overview

Appeals to District Courts. District courts have jurisdiction over final judgments entered by bankruptcy judges as well as the jurisdiction to hear appeals with leave of court from interlocutory orders and decrees. 28 U.S.C. §158(a)(1). See, e.g., In re Purdue Pharma, L.P., 2021 WL 5979108, ** 41-42 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 16, 2021) ("release of [third party] claim," in absence of consent, "a final judgment" in context of plan confirmation order; but bankruptcy court not constitutionally authorized to enter judgment on tort claim, which is subject to de novo review as a proposed legal conclusion under 28 U.S.C. §157(c)(1)); court vacated confirmation order in non-final interlocutory ruling because plan still can be modified on remand). Also, an interlocutory order issued under 11 U.S.C. §1121(d) affecting the debtor's exclusive period to file a reorganization plan is automatically appealable. 28 U.S.C. §158(a)(2). As a practical matter, the appellate jurisdiction of district courts is limited to proceedings in which bankruptcy courts are authorized to issue judicial determinations under 28 U.S.C §§1334(a) and 157(a). In re Walker, 51 F.3d 562 (5th Cir. 1995) (bankruptcy judge lacks power to hear proceedings that district court cannot hear and determine; §157 allows district court to refer cases to bankruptcy court).

Appeals to Bankruptcy Appellate Panels. A bankruptcy appellate panel (BAP) is made up of three bankruptcy judges to hear appeals from bankruptcy court final judgments, orders, and decrees. 28 U.S.C. §158(b)(1). Those who serve on the panels hear appeals from bankruptcy court orders entered in other districts. 28 U.S.C. §158 (b)(2), (5). BAPs may grant leave to appeal from bankruptcy courts' interlocutory "orders or decrees," id., but Article III courts are not bound by the decisions of BAPs. In re Cardelucci, 285 F.3d 1231, 1234 (9th Cir. 2002). BAPs must: a) be established by a judicial council of a circuit; b) be approved by a majority of the district judges for the district in which the appeals occur; and c) all parties must consent to a disposition by the panel. The district court must hear an appeal if these criteria are not satisfied. 28 U.S.C. §158(b), (c). One side to a litigation may thus preclude BAP review.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Overview of Regulatory Guidance Governing the Use of AI Systems In the Workplace Image

Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.

Is Google Search Dead? How AI Is Reshaping Search and SEO Image

This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.

While Federal Legislation Flounders, State Privacy Laws for Children and Teens Gain Momentum Image

For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.

Revolutionizing Workplace Design: A Perspective from Gray Reed Image

In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.

From DeepSeek to Distillation: Protecting IP In An AI World Image

Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.