Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Personal managers have long complained that the California Talent Agencies Act, Calif. Labor §1700 et seq., treats them inequitably. For example, personal managers claim the phrase "procure employment" in §1700.4(a), for determining when a state talent-agent license is needed for getting work for talent, doesn't provide sufficient clarity to managers.
The California Labor Commissioner (CLC) has exclusive, original jurisdiction over claims brought under the TAA, but decisions by the CLC may take several years. If a TAA complaint is initially filed in California state court, the court must place the case on hold until the labor commissioner issues a ruling before the court can engage in a de novo review of the dispute.
But what happens if a personal manager files a lawsuit in a court outside of California against a talent client who has raised a TAA claim in California?
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.