Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Medina v. 676 Hunts Point Realty Cop., NYLJ 12/13/21, p. 18, col. 5, AppDiv, First Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In a personal injury action against commercial landlord, landlord and tenant's assignee appealed from Supreme Court's grant of summary judgment to tenant, but not tenant's assignee, on landlord's cross-claim for contractual and common law indemnification. The Appellate Division modified to grant summary judgment to tenant's assignee, emphasizing that the subject lease did not include the sidewalk on which the injury occurred.
The commercial lease at issue did not include the sidewalk adjacent to the demised premises, nor transfer any responsibility for repair of the sidewalk to tenant. Tenant subsequently assigned the lease to assignee. When the injured plaintiff brought this action against landlord, tenant, and tenant's assignee, landlord cross-claimed for contractual and common law indemnification. Supreme Court granted the tenant's summary judgment motion, but denied assignee's summary judgment motion.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.