Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Tribeca Space Managers, Inc. v. Tribeca Mews Ltd, NYLJ 12/30/21 p. 21, col. 6, AppDiv, First Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In an action by condominium board against condominium sponsor for failure to construct the building in conformity with plans and specifications and the building code, the board appealed from Supreme Court's grant of sponsor's motion to preclude evidence at trial of patent and latent defects for which notice was not provided within the time period specified in the offering plan. The Appellate Division modified to deny the motion with respect to defects related to failure to conform with the code or the plans and specifications, but otherwise affirmed.
The board alleged numerous breaches of contract by the sponsor. The sponsor contended that the board had failed to provide timely notice of these breaches, as required by the governing documents. Accordingly, sponsor sought to exclude evidence of those defects at trial, and Supreme Court granted sponsor's motion. The board appealed.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?