Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Infinite Green, Inc. v. Town of Babylon, NYLJ 11/28/22, p. 27, col. 3, AppDiv, Second Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In landowner's action challenging the constitutionality of the town's rental permit law, the town appealed from Supreme Court's grant of summary judgment to the town. The Appellate Division reversed, holding that the permit law did not constitute an unconstitutional search or seizure.
According to the town code, an owner who applies for a rental permit must provide a certification of code compliance from either the town building inspector or a licensed professional engineer. When the town zoning inspector accused landowner of violating the code provision, landowner brought this action challenging the constitutionality of the provision because it required landowner to consent to a warrantless inspection as a precondition to obtaining the permit. Supreme Court granted summary judgment to landowner.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?