Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Second Circuit 'Connolly' Ruling Shows Limits of Mail and Wire Fraud Statutes

By Elkan Abramowitz and Jonathan Sack
April 01, 2022

Since about 2011, the Department of Justice has devoted considerable effort to investigate and prosecute alleged manipulation of the London Inter-Bank Offer Rate (LIBOR). LIBOR is an interest rate benchmark that is so embedded in the global financial system that, despite much criticism, and even during DOJ's investigations and prosecutions, LIBOR has continued to be used by institutional borrowers and lenders, and will not be phased out fully until June 2023.

DOJ's efforts have led to civil and criminal charges against global banks, resulting in the payment of approximately $8.5 billion in fines and penalties, and the prosecution of over 20 individuals in the United States and the UK, including Matthew Connolly and Gavin Black of Deutsche Bank AG (DB). Connolly and Black pled not guilty and were convicted at trial in 2018. Despite being critical of the government's handling of the investigation, the district court denied motions for acquittal and for a new trial.

In a stunning turn of events, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed the convictions in United States v. Connolly, 24 F.4th 821 (2d Cir. 2022). The court found the evidence of guilt to be insufficient as a matter of law and directed the district court to enter judgments of acquittal. The Second Circuit held that the government had not proved — and could not prove at another trial — that Connolly and Black had made false statements, and thus they did not commit the wire fraud and conspiracy offenses for which they were indicted.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies Image

Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.