Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A character trademark of the TV detective Columbo, portrayed by actor Peter Falk, was to unbalance a homicide suspect he had been questioning by seemingly walking out of the room only to turn back to the suspect to ask "just one more thing." The 1971 agreement between Universal City Studios and the successful TV series' creators William Link and Richard Levinson permitted Universal to be a distributor of Columbo "photoplays." The agreement refers to "photoplay" several dozen times in such references as "anthological photoplays," "episodic photoplays," "pilot photoplay," "feature-length photoplay" and "television photoplays." But the contract parties failed to include "just one more thing" when negotiating their 17-page memo deal and two-page rider: a definition of the key term "photoplays."
Columbo had two successful network runs, on NBC from 1971 to 1978, and on ABC from 1989 to 2003, grossing a total of around $600 million. Years later, Universal was claiming the TV series hadn't yet earned net profits. In 2017, Link's Foxcroft Productions and Levinson's Fairmount Productions sued in part for breach of contract on the ground that the meaning of "photoplay" was ambiguous in the 1971 agreement, which thus didn't allow Universal to pay itself $160 million in distribution fees for acting as a distributor of the series' episodes and deduct the fees before "net profits" would be paid to Link and Levinson.
In 2019, a Los Angeles Superior Court jury decided Universal breached the 1971 agreement. (Levinson died before the trial began.) However, the trial judge, Richard J. Burdge, had given the jurors no definition for "photoplays" and there was no extrinsic evidence as to the negotiating parties' understanding of the term.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.
This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.
For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.
In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.
Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.