Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A character trademark of the TV detective Columbo, portrayed by actor Peter Falk, was to unbalance a homicide suspect he had been questioning by seemingly walking out of the room only to turn back to the suspect to ask "just one more thing." The 1971 agreement between Universal City Studios and the successful TV series' creators William Link and Richard Levinson permitted Universal to be a distributor of Columbo "photoplays." The agreement refers to "photoplay" several dozen times in such references as "anthological photoplays," "episodic photoplays," "pilot photoplay," "feature-length photoplay" and "television photoplays." But the contract parties failed to include "just one more thing" when negotiating their 17-page memo deal and two-page rider: a definition of the key term "photoplays."
Columbo had two successful network runs, on NBC from 1971 to 1978, and on ABC from 1989 to 2003, grossing a total of around $600 million. Years later, Universal was claiming the TV series hadn't yet earned net profits. In 2017, Link's Foxcroft Productions and Levinson's Fairmount Productions sued in part for breach of contract on the ground that the meaning of "photoplay" was ambiguous in the 1971 agreement, which thus didn't allow Universal to pay itself $160 million in distribution fees for acting as a distributor of the series' episodes and deduct the fees before "net profits" would be paid to Link and Levinson.
In 2019, a Los Angeles Superior Court jury decided Universal breached the 1971 agreement. (Levinson died before the trial began.) However, the trial judge, Richard J. Burdge, had given the jurors no definition for "photoplays" and there was no extrinsic evidence as to the negotiating parties' understanding of the term.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Our friends at Edge Marketing are ending the year by sharing their predictions for 2025. From the continued evolution of generative AI and its many uses to an increase in multimedia and hypertargeting, these are some of the key factors that will guide legal marketing strategies in the new year.
As organizations enhance their e-discovery processes and infrastructure, the expectation to leverage technology to maximize service delivery increases. However, legal professionals must balance innovation with humanity.
The business-law issue of whether and when a corporate defendant is considered distinct from its affiliated entities emerged on December 11 at the U.S. Supreme Court, with the justices confronting whether a non-defendant’s affiliate’s revenue can be part of a judge’s calculation of the monetary remedy for the corporate defendant’s infringement of a trademark.
The most forward-thinking companies embrace AI with complete confidence because they have created governance programs that serve as guardrails for this incredible new technology. Effective governance ensures AI consistently aligns with an organization’s best interests, safeguarding against potential risks while unlocking its full potential.
It’s time for our annual poll of experts on what they expect 2025 to bring in legal tech, including generative AI (of course), e-discovery, and more.