Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Real Property Law

By NYRE Staff
May 01, 2022
|

Purchaser of Mixed-Use Building, Not Master Lessee of Residential Units, Liable for Rent Overcharges

Walsam 316, LLC v. 316 Bowery Realty Corp., NYLJ 1/24/22, p. 19, col. 4, AppDiv, First Dept. (memorandum opinion)

In an action by purchaser of a mixed-use building seeking indemnification and contribution from its seller and from lessee of the residential units, purchaser and lessee cross-appealed from Supreme Court's order limiting purchaser's remedy against seller to amounts specified in the contract, and granting purchaser summary judgment on its counterclaim against lessee. The Appellate Division modified to deny purchaser summary judgment on the counterclaim against lessee, holding that purchaser took subject to lease provisions that imposed liability for rent overcharges on the seller-lessor, not the lessee of residential units.

Seller initially contracted to convert the building to a condominium, and to sell the residential units in the building to lessee, but when the conversion was not completed, seller executed a 99-year master lease of the residential units to lessee. The lease represented that the rents did not exceed those permitted by law, and also provided that in the event of a sale of the leased premises, it would be deemed that the purchaser would assume all covenants and obligations of the master lease. After residential tenants began rent overcharge litigation, seller entered into a purchase and sale agreement with purchaser covering all of seller's interest in the premises, subject to the terms of the master lease. The purchase and sale agreement contained a carveout providing that seller would continue to pay counsel fees in the rent overcharge litigation up to $100,000, and would indemnify purchaser for any liability arising from that litigation up to a total of $250,000. In this action purchaser sought indemnification and contribution from both seller and lessee for any liability for rent overcharges. Lessee counterclaimed for breach of contract. Supreme Court awarded purchaser summary judgment against seller, but only up to the contractually limited amount, awarded lessee summary judgment on its breach of contract counterclaim against purchaser, and awarded purchaser summary judgment on its claim for indemnification and contribution claims against lessee. Purchaser and lessee appealed.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.