Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In Keystone Specialty Services Co. v. Ebaugh, 267 A.3d 1250 (2021), the Superior Court of Pennsylvania recently affirmed a lower court's summary judgement decision in favor of the defendant-landlord finding that the tenant's negligence claims were barred by the exculpatory provisions in the lease.
In Keystone, the tenant leased 1,500 square feet on the first floor of the landlord's building. Id. at 1252. The tenant's causes of action in Keystone stemmed from water damage to the tenant's equipment and personal property stored at the leased building. Id.
The tenant alleged that in March 2015 it entered the premises and "found water cascading through the ceiling" and immediately told the landlord. Id at 1253. A month later, the tenant reentered the premises and found the water infiltration continuing with mold growing on the tenant's personal property and again notified the landlord. Id. The tenant maintained that the water infiltration continued into June of 2015 when a broken pipe was discovered at the premises. Id.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?