Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
At a time when climate change has been referred to by the President of the United States as our "existential crisis," and investors are pouring trillions of dollars into green, sustainable funds, more and more companies and investment funds are touting their climate and environmental bona fides. In April of this year, Mastercard announced that it was going to link all employee bonuses to meeting ESG (environmental, social and governance) goals. See, "Mastercard (MA) to Tie All Employee Bonuses to Meeting ESG Goals," Bloomberg (April 19, 2022). Similarly, in March of this year, Goldman Sachs announced that directors at companies in which Goldman invests who fail to provide sufficient climate risk disclosure are at risk of being voted out by Goldman.
These are important and laudable steps. But as evidenced by the SEC's recent activities and announcements, doing well while doing good carries with it some risks.
Issuers and other registrants with the SEC are required, in their SEC filings, including their annual reports, to disclose material information; that is, information that a reasonable investor would consider important in deciding how to vote or make an investment decision, or would have altered the total mix of available information. See, e.g., Basic v. Levinson, 485 U.S. 224, 231 (1988). Failure to do so can result in SEC action and in the most egregious cases a referral to the DOJ who may decide to prosecute. Similarly, false statements or a material omission in a company's marketing materials, analyst calls or other interactions with shareholders or potential investors can result in similar enforcement actions, not to mention shareholder suits. All one has to look to is the recent prosecution of Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.