Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Given the current proliferation of streaming services such as Peacock, Amazon Prime Video, HBO Max, Hulu, Disney+, Apple TV+, Discovery+, Paramount+, and the industry torchbearer Netflix, no truer words may have ever been uttered than "content is king." Piracy, on the other hand, is older than the printing press.
In the last two decades, the music industry and, more specifically, songwriters, producers and recording artists have been losing the value of their efforts to online piracy while certain Internet Service Providers (ISPs) may deliberately turn a blind eye to their pirating subscribers while reaping the benefit of the subscribers' monthly payments.
The legal precedent here is clear due to the four-year, pitched battle between BMG Rights and ISP provider Cox Communications that resulted in a holding that ISPs can be held liable for their subscribers' infringement. BMG Rights Management (US) LLC v. Cox Communications Inc., 881 F.3d 293 (4th Cir. 2018). The record labels have brought subsequent ISP cases against Cox, Grande, Charter, RCN and Bright House to combat infringement. And now a collective of film producers is pursuing Wide Open West, Grande, and RCN.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.