Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
As Congress struggles to determine whether it will finally pass a law defining insider trading, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have trained their sights on an ever-widening array of insider trading practices and theories. Recent cases have focused on the purchase and sale of material non-public information on the dark web and the use of a variation of traditional insider trading called "shadow trading." The government is now investigating whether financial institutions have engaged in insider trading by tipping some of their clients about large, market-moving "block trades" in securities that the financial institutions are scheduled to handle for other clients. This article discusses how the government might frame insider trading cases based on allegations of tipping before the execution of block trades in securities.
|A block trade in securities is a transaction involving either more than 10,000 shares or shares worth at least $200,000. See, 17 CFR §242.600(b)(12); NYSE Information Memorandum Number 14-06 (Feb. 25, 2014). Because block trades are large, these trades may be "market moving." To minimize the market impact, a shareholder trading a large block of stock will often conceal its role in the block trade by running it through a financial institution. Block trading is big business for the financial institutions who handle these transactions. According to data from Dealogic, in 2021, broker-dealers executed more than $70 billion of block trades in the United States. See, Gillian Tan, Katherine Burton, Sridhar Natarajan, "What Block Trades Are and Why the SEC's Investigating," Bloomberg (Feb. 16, 2022).
Historically, block trading of securities has been regulated by individual stock exchanges, and not by the DOJ or the SEC. The New York Stock Exchange, for example, has warned its members against trading on information about impending block trades or sharing that information with other market participants. NYSE Information Memorandum Number 95-28 (July 10, 1995).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.