Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Berg v. Chelsea Hotel Owner LLC, NYLJ 3/15/22, p. 18, col. 1, AppDiv, First Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In tenant's action for breach of the warranty of habitability, private nuisance, harassment and assault, tenant appealed from Supreme Court's orders granting landlord's motions to dismiss. The Appellate Division reversed, holding that tenant had alleged facts sufficient to support the various claims.
Tenant alleged that repeated interruptions of heat, hot water, gas and electricity, and disruptions of elevator service, phone, television, and internet service, together with flooding, mold, and rat and vermin infestations. Tenant also alleged that landlord's principal screamed expletives at her and spewed his spittle into her fact so that a building employee had to step between the two of them. Based on these facts, tenant brought this action, but Supreme Court granted landlord's motion to dismiss.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?