Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Preferred Equity In Peril?
Preferred equity instruments have become increasingly popular as a source of financing for private equity sponsors executing large leveraged acquisitions. Investors seeking the risk profile of debt but also the return potential of equity are attracted to the hybrid nature of preferred equity, which generally ranks senior to common equity interests (like debt) and may entitle the holder to common equity-like upside. By law, preferred equity is a varied and flexible instrument, but, in practice, it typically has a limited number of common features. One feature is that the preferred equity is entitled to a "liquidation preference" ahead of common stock. The liquidation preference is typically triggered upon a "liquidation, dissolution or winding up" whether "voluntary or involuntary" and most often equal to a fixed dollar amount per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends to the date of the liquidation, dissolution or winding up.
Whether the liquidation preference of preferred equity entitles preferred shareholders to priority over common shareholders in a Chapter 11 reorganization is a question that figured prominently in two recent high profile cases, Washington Prime Group, Inc. and CBL & Associates Properties, Inc., two public REITs (real estate investment trusts) that filed for Chapter 11 due to fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic. In each case, the debtors sought approval of a disclosure statement for a plan that contemplated holders of common stock and preferred stock sharing in a distribution on a 50-50 basis, disregarding the liquidation preference in favor of the preferred stock. In each case, dissenting parties previewed (and in CBL, ultimately, prosecuted) objections to the plan on the grounds that the distributions to common stock would violate the absolute priority rule, and in each case, the plan was ultimately confirmed with the application of the absolute priority rule to preferred stock left unaddressed. These cases highlight a risk that the lack of explicit language in applicable governing documents regarding the treatment of preferred equity in a Chapter 11 reorganization could result in parties arguing that preferred equity holders, for purposes of plan distribution, should be treated no better than common shareholders, which may be contrary to the expectations of investors in preferred equity instruments.
CBL and Washington Prime: Deathtraps to Avoid Priority Issues
In both CBL and Washington Prime, enterprise valuation was a prominent litigable issue as a result of the difficulties inherent in ascertaining the effect of the COVID-19 on real property values. Nevertheless, in both cases, the debtors took the position that, under the plan, unsecured claims were not being paid in full, and thus there was no value available for equity under an absolute priority waterfall. This position enabled the CBL debtors to argue that providing a distribution to common equity when preferred shares were receiving less than their liquidation preference was not a departure from "absolute priority," because the distribution to equity was a "tip," and "the liquidation preference is only applicable where value is otherwise available for distribution to equity holders."
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?