Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Preferred equity instruments have become increasingly popular as a source of financing for private equity sponsors executing large leveraged acquisitions. Investors seeking the risk profile of debt but also the return potential of equity are attracted to the hybrid nature of preferred equity, which generally ranks senior to common equity interests (like debt) and may entitle the holder to common equity-like upside. By law, preferred equity is a varied and flexible instrument, but, in practice, it typically has a limited number of common features. One feature is that the preferred equity is entitled to a "liquidation preference" ahead of common stock. The liquidation preference is typically triggered upon a "liquidation, dissolution or winding up" whether "voluntary or involuntary" and most often equal to a fixed dollar amount per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends to the date of the liquidation, dissolution or winding up.
Whether the liquidation preference of preferred equity entitles preferred shareholders to priority over common shareholders in a Chapter 11 reorganization is a question that figured prominently in two recent high profile cases, Washington Prime Group, Inc. and CBL & Associates Properties, Inc., two public REITs (real estate investment trusts) that filed for Chapter 11 due to fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic. In each case, the debtors sought approval of a disclosure statement for a plan that contemplated holders of common stock and preferred stock sharing in a distribution on a 50-50 basis, disregarding the liquidation preference in favor of the preferred stock. In each case, dissenting parties previewed (and in CBL, ultimately, prosecuted) objections to the plan on the grounds that the distributions to common stock would violate the absolute priority rule, and in each case, the plan was ultimately confirmed with the application of the absolute priority rule to preferred stock left unaddressed. These cases highlight a risk that the lack of explicit language in applicable governing documents regarding the treatment of preferred equity in a Chapter 11 reorganization could result in parties arguing that preferred equity holders, for purposes of plan distribution, should be treated no better than common shareholders, which may be contrary to the expectations of investors in preferred equity instruments.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.