Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
At present, 25 states, including the District of Columbia, have legalized marijuana. While the number of states and territories with laws and policies allowing for the cultivation, sale, distribution and possession of marijuana for recreational or medicinal purposes has grown over the last decade, marijuana continues to be classified as a Schedule I controlled substance, in the same category as heroin and ecstasy, under the federal Controlled Substance Act (CSA). The growing disconnect between federal and state marijuana laws and policies creates legal risks for not only those engaged in the cultivation and sale of marijuana, but also for suppliers, landlords, investors and financial institutions directly or indirectly related to marijuana businesses.
The Schedule I status of marijuana makes it problematic for marijuana businesses to access traditional banking and financial services to obtain funds necessary to fund, operate and grow their businesses. Banks, often federally insured, are reluctant to lend to marijuana businesses fearing scrutiny by federal regulators. Banks must report suspicious activity, including business funds stemming from illegal activities, which under federal law includes the sale of marijuana, leaving banks who lend to marijuana business subject to federal enforcement actions and monetary fines.
Similarly, federal bankruptcy courts have been unavailable to marijuana businesses due to the Schedule I status of marijuana. The current position of the United States Trustee is that: 1) the bankruptcy system cannot be an instrument for an ongoing commission of a crime; and 2) trustees and other estate fiduciaries should not be required to administer assets in violation of federal law. In a letter issued by the Executive Office for United States Trustees (the Direction Letter), Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 trustees are directed to promptly notify the United States Trustee when a marijuana asset is discovered in a bankruptcy case. The Direction Letter advises that the United States Trustee's policy is to move to dismiss or object in each case involving marijuana assets, because they cannot be administered under the Bankruptcy Code.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.
This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.
For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.
In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.
Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.