Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, denied a motion to compel arbitration of a copyright infringement lawsuit over rights to the reality TV program Cheaters Uncensored. Bobby Goldstein Productions Inc. (BGP) v. Habeeb, 3:21-CV-1924. Bobby Goldstein created the TV show Cheaters and formed the production company BGP. Tommy Habeeb, who Goldstein collaborated with, later sued Goldstein himself in Texas state court over ownership rights to Cheaters. A 2005 settlement of the suit gave Habeeb "the exclusive right to approach potential pay-per-view and premium channel outlets and negotiate the terms of any agreement to broadcast Cheaters Uncensored" but deemed Goldstein "owner of all copyright in any and all footage of Cheaters that will be the basis for Cheaters Uncensored and will own the copyright in all episodes of Cheaters Uncensored." In 2021, BGP sued Habeeb, alleging Habeeb didn't have a "license to make copies of the Episodes on the Internet or to make the Episodes and/or derivative works thereof available for performance or display by the public on the Internet." Habeeb moved for arbitration of the copyright dispute under the 2005 settlement. First, Senior Northern District Judge A. Joe Fish agreed with BGP that the settlement agreement "resolved a lawsuit between Mr. Habeeb and Mr. Goldstein. BGP was neither a party to the lawsuit nor a signatory to the settlement agreement; indeed, the terms of the settlement agreement do not even mention BGP, and there is no evidence that the parties intended the settlement agreement to apply to BGP." And even if it did, Senior District Judge Fish found: "The court agrees with BGP that the '[d]efendants make no attempt to provide any argument — much less evidence — to demonstrate that their infringing internet-based copyright violations relate to negotiations with any pay-per-view or premium channel outlet."
*****
|The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, decided that Darwin Quinn and Mitchelle'l Sium, co-authors with Roland "Lil Duval" Powell of the song "Back N Forth," weren't co-owners of a subsequent composition that included the hook from "Back N Forth." Quinn v. Powell, 1:21-cv-03163. After writing with Quinn and Sium, Lil Duval re-recorded the hook from that song, with a beat created by Corey "Mr. Hanky" Dennard and a verse by Snoop Dogg, as "Smile (Living My Best Life)." Quinn and Sium filed suit against Lil Duval for a declaratory ruling of co-ownership of "Smile," an accounting and a constructive trust. Granting a defense motion to dismiss the complaint without prejudice. Northern District Judge Steven D. Grimberg explained: "Defendants contend that, even if Plaintiffs co-own the song Back N Forth, the song Smile is, at most, a derivative work of Back N Forth. Thus, Defendants argue that, as a matter of law, the alleged joint authorship in the prior work Back N Forth, standing alone, would be insufficient to make Plaintiffs joint authors of the derivative work Smile. The Court agrees." District Judge Grimberg added that because Quinn and Sium "failed to allege that each of the putative co-authors [including Mr. Hanky] intended to be joint owners of Smile … Plaintiffs failed to state a claim of joint ownership." Quinn and Sium have since filed a complaint that states Snoop Dogg and Mr. Hanky "manifested an intent to be co-writers" of "Smile" with the plaintiffs. Quinn v. Powell, 1:22-cv-02404.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.