Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Harpaz v. Dunn, 2022 WL 867892, AppDiv, First Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In a condominium board member's action for defamation against the condominium president, plaintiff board member appealed from Supreme Court's grant of the president's motion to dismiss. The Appellate Division affirmed, holding that attendees at the board meeting were cloaked in common interest privilege.
During a condominium board member, the board president allegedly defamed plaintiff, the board treasurer, by calling for a vote to rebuke her based on reports that she was harassing condominium employees. The vote passed and the fact was published in the board minutes. The treasurer was subsequently removed from her position as treasurer. She then brought this defamation action, which Supreme Court dismissed.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.