Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Legal Tech: Can Claiming Incompetence Save You from Spoliation Sanctions?
"Humans are just as likely to be dimwitted as they are dastardly." Hollis v. CEVA Logistics U.S., Inc. (N.D. Ill., May 19, 2022).
A recent opinion from Judge Iain Johnston (N.D. Ill) raises the question of whether spoliating parties should be encouraged to present the following defense at trial: "Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, yes the main evidence of this case has been destroyed, but it's only because my client and my law firm are completely incompetent when it comes to preserving electronic evidence." Has it really come down to this?
They Said, They Said
This case started with an argument between two employees of CEVA Logistics, Darren Hollis and Phillip Bayer, on the company's warehouse floor. Mr. Bayer and two others, all white, provided witness statements to their supervisor, Mr. Berkshire, reporting that Mr. Hollis yelled and pushed or grabbed Bayer. Hollis and another witness, both black, provided counterstatements describing Hollis as raising his hands solely to defend himself from Bayer. An additional witness, also black, subsequently provided a declaration stating that he told Berkshire that he never saw Hollis touch Bayer. In this "they said, they said" situation, Berkshire made the decision to terminate Hollis, which occurred less than one week later.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?