Questions Surround Expanded Government Authority to Seize Russian Assets

The proposals also include adding a new offense, making it unlawful for any person to knowingly possess proceeds directly obtained from corrupt dealings with the Russian government. Beyond the continuing refrain of overcriminalization — seeking to solve each new problem by adding yet another ill-defined federal crime to the books — this offense has the troubling aspect of criminalizing political affiliation. In law school, aspiring lawyers are taught the two basic types of crimes: malum in se (wrong by nature) and malum prohibitum (wrong by virtue of a government prohibition). The proposed asset seizure draws us down a dangerous path to what may come to be known as malum politica — wrong by politics. Congress and the Biden administration need carefully to consider whether making political affiliation a crime in this instance would set a dangerous precedent for the future. Legal advocates need to be alert to legislation or enforcement that threatens to undermine due process protections.

Guilty By Association — Literally

As part of its efforts to provide aid to Ukraine in resisting Russia's invasion, the U.S. government has sanctioned certain foreign individuals who are affiliated with the Putin regime and frozen or seized their assets. Seeking to expand upon this strategy, Congress and the Biden administration have issued proposals seeking to seize and dispose of the assets of private individuals — rather than corporations or state actors—to punish the independent conduct of a nation-state — only because of that individual's historical political support of the nation state.