Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Miller v. Stilwell Road, Inc., NYLJ 4/6/22, p. 22, col. 4, AppDiv, Second Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, junior lender appealed from Supreme Court's judgment of foreclosure and declaration, after a nonjury trial, that the junior lender was subordinate to the first mortgage. The Appellate Division affirmed, holding that Supreme Court's credibility determinations were entitled to deference.
SRI borrowed $300,000 from junior lender in July 2008. The loan agreement required SRI to acquire the subject premises, to build a residential home for sale on the premises, and to pay junior lender the loan principal plus 25% of the net profit of any sale. Sale of the premises required junior lender's consent, but the agreement permitted SRI to mortgage or otherwise encumber the property. On April 18, 2017, junior lender filed a UCC-1 financing statement.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.