Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Andreas v. 186 Tenants Corp., 2022 WL 1309154, AppDiv, First Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In an action by co-op shareholders for breach of contract and breach of the warranty of habitability, shareholders appealed from Supreme Court's dismissal of the habitability claim, grant of partial summary judgment to the co-op on its breach of contract counterclaim, and award of attorney's fees to the corporation. The Appellate Division modified to defer determination of attorney's fees, but otherwise affirmed.
In response to leaks in their apartment, shareholders brought this action for breach of the implied warranty and breach of the lease and paid maintenance into escrow rather than to the co-op corporation. Supreme Court dismissed the breach of warranty claim and granted summary judgment to the corporation on its counterclaim for release of the withheld maintenance. Supreme Court also granted attorney's fees to the corporation.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?