Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Bankruptcy Code provides a Chapter 11 debtor a powerful commercial lease tool to aid its restructuring efforts. A debtor may assume valuable real estate leases, and reject onerous ones. As explained below, a debtor's time to assume commercial leases under which it is a lessee is limited to either 210 or 300 days from the date of the bankruptcy filing, unless the landlord consents to further extensions. The Bankruptcy Code further provides that a debtor's failure to assume a commercial lease before expiration of this time limit results in the lease being "deemed rejected," requiring the debtor to surrender immediately possession of the leases premises.
Given the potentially harsh consequence of failing to timely assume a vital lease, a Chapter 11 debtor must be vigilant to avoid a forfeiture. It is important to know, however, that all might not be lost even if the debtor misses this deadline. The Bankruptcy Code allows a debtor to assume an executory contract at any time up to confirmation of a plan of reorganization. There is case law supporting the proposition that separate lease agreements and contracts executed as part of a single, integrated transaction should be construed as a single agreement so the lease may be assumed even if the Bankruptcy Code's shorter deadlines for assumption and rejection of commercial leases has expired. Accordingly, a debtor may have until plan confirmation to assume a commercial lease that was signed as part of a single integrated agreement that includes other executory contracts.
|The Bankruptcy Code permits a trustee (or debtor in possession) to "assume or reject any executory contract or unexpired lease of the debtor." 11 U.S.C. §365(a). Generally, a debtor may assume or reject leases of residential or personal property and executory contracts at any time before confirmation of a plan. See, 11 U.S.C §365(d)(2).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.