Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Matter of Chynn v. County of Suffolk, 4/25/22, p. 29, col. 2, AppDiv, Second Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In claimants' proceedings for compensation arising from condemnation of their beachfront homes, the county appealed from Supreme Court's awards of $1,750,000 and $1,830,000 to the two claimants. The Appellate Division modified to reduce the awards to $1,578,000 and $1,646,000, concluding that Supreme Court had improperly adjusted the awards for condemnation blight.
In 2016, the County of Suffolk took title to two beachfront homes on Fire Island as part of a project to reconstruct beaches and restore the dune network. At a nonjury trial on just compensation, the parties agreed that the highest and best use of the property was residential, and the parties and the county produced expert testimony, using a sales comparison approach, on the issue of the market value of the properties. Supreme Court reached a valuation figure in between the estimates by the claimants and the count. In reaching that valuation, the court included an upward adjustment of 5% for the impact of condemnation blight on the properties. Claimants' expert had testified that in light of Hurricane Sandy, comparable waterfront properties had declined in value because of the fear that condemnation proceedings might be instituted. The county appealed, arguing that the adjustment was unwarranted and also contending that other adjustments to comparable sales were improper.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?