Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
IP News
Copyright Standing and Fifth Circuit Trade Dress Factors
In Beatriz Ball, L.L.C. v. Barbagallo Company, L.L.C., No. 21-30029, 2022 WL 2688637, at *1 (5th Cir. July 12, 2022), the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed and remanded a judgement from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. The lower court had held that Beatriz Ball lacked standing under the Copyright Act and did not own protectible trade dress.
Background
Beatriz Ball, LLC was assigned registered copyrights protecting four Organic Pearl designs and unregistered trade dress for an Organic Pearl collection for "tableware of hand-crafted and artisanal quality." The defendant began marketing and distributing products similar to the Organic Pearl designs in 2016. Beatriz Ball, LLC sued Pampa Bay for copyright and trade dress infringement. The district court found that the plaintiff did not meet its burden to establish that the unregistered trade dress had acquired secondary meaning. Additionally, the district court held Beatriz Ball, LLC lacked standing to bring the copyright claims because of a lack of legal interest in the cause of action. Beatriz Ball Collection, the original registrant of the copyrights, assigned ownership of the copyrights to the plaintiff Beatriz Ball, LLC a few days before the lawsuit was filed. However, the district court found that the assignment failed to transfer the right to causes of action for prior infringements. Beatriz Ball, LLC appealed and challenged the district court's holding that i) it lacks standing for the copyright claim, and ii) the Organic Pearl trade dress did not acquire secondary meaning.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.