Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
138-140 West 32nd Street Associates, LLC v. 138-140 West 32nd Street Associates, NYLJ 4/18/22, p. 18, col. 1, AppDiv, First Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In buyer's action for breach of contract to by commercial property, seller appealed from Supreme Court's grant of partial summary judgment to buyer. The Appellate Division affirmed, holding that one of the seller's partners had authority to sell the property even though the deed was held by the two partners as tenants in common.
Buyer contracted to purchase two parcels from a partnership. One of the deeds was held in the name of the partnership, while the deed to the other property was held by the partners as tenants in common. Because the contract of sale was signed by only one of the two partners, sellers contended that the contract was not enforceable. Sellers also contended that the contract failed for lack of consideration because purchaser did not timely make the $400,000 deposit required by the sale contract. Supreme Court rejected both contentions and awarded partial summary judgment to buyer. Sellers appealed.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.