Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Miranda Holdings, Inc. v. Town Board of the Town of Orchard Park, 2022 WL 2092594, AppDiv, Fourth Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In landowner's article 78 proceeding/ declaratory judgment action challenging the town's enactment of a local law prohibiting use of drive-through windows in an architectural overlay district, the town appealed from Supreme Court's grant of the petition. The Appellate Division affirmed, holding that the town had failed to comply with the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA).
Landowner sought approval of a commercial structure with a restaurant that included a drive-through window. A 2019 local law prohibits the use of drive-through windows in the Architectural Overlay District. Landowner brought this article 78 proceeding contending that the local law was adopted in violation of SEQRA because the town failed to treat the law as a "Type I" action. Supreme Court granted the petition and the town appealed.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?