Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A recent bankruptcy case from the District of Delaware underscores the need for a trademark licensor to be alert to filings made in its licensee's bankruptcy case that may require prompt action by the licensor to protect its valuable rights under a license agreement. In re Armstrong Flooring, Inc., Chapter 11 Case No. 22-10426 (MFW) (Bankr. D. Del. July 22, 2022).
In that case, at the request of the debtor licensee, Armstrong Flooring, Inc., the bankruptcy court issued a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction that directed Armstrong World Industries, Inc. and AWI Licensing LLC, the licensors under a trademark license agreement with the debtor licensee (the License Agreement), to execute written consents to the assignment by the debtor licensee of its rights and obligations under the License Agreement to the successful bidders for the debtor licensee's assets at sales conducted under section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code.
|The License Agreement had its genesis in 2016, when Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (AWI) divested itself of its floor tile products business by spinning off its subsidiary, Armstrong Flooring, Inc. (AF). In connection with that transaction, AWI and its licensing subsidiary, AWI Licensing LLC (AWI Licensing), entered into the License Agreement with AF.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.