Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Development

By NYRE Staff
November 01, 2022
|

Article 78 Proceeding Not Ripe Even Though ZBA Had Not Made a Decision Within 62-Day Time Limit

Matter of 999 Hempstead Turnpike, LLC v. Board of Appeals, 2022 WL 2962605, AppDiv, Second Dept. (memorandum opinion)

In landowner's article 78 proceeding challenging denial of a special exception permit and area variance, the town appealed from Supreme Court's grant of the permit. The Appellate Division reversed, holding that Supreme Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the Board of Appeals (ZBA) had not yet made a final determination.

In 2018, landowner sought an area variance and special exception permit in connection with proposed construction of a self-storage facility. The ZBA held a public hearing. Although Town Law section 267-a(8) requires a ZBA to render a decision within 62 days, the ZBA did not do so. Landowner brought this article 78 proceeding, relying on Town Law section 267-a(13)(b), which provides that if the ZBA, in exercising its appellate jurisdiction, fails to render a decision within 62 days, the application is deemed denied. The ZBA failed to answer the petition, and Supreme Court granted landowner's petition and directed the ZBA to issue the special exception permit and area variance. The ZBA moved to vacate the order and the court denied the motion. The ZBA appealed.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.