Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
IP News
Federal Circuit: No Patent Term Adjustments When Claims Change
On Sept. 14, 2022, a Federal Circuit panel of Judges Newman, Linn, and Chen issued a unanimous decision in Sawstop Holding LLC v. Vidal, No. 2021-1537 (Fed. Cir. 2022). The Federal Circuit affirmed the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia's grant of summary judgment in favor of the United States Patent and Trademark Office's (PTO) decision to refuse to award an additional patent term adjustment for U.S. Patent No. 9,522,476 (the '476 patent) and U.S. Patent No. 9,927,796 (the '796 patent and collectively, the patents-at-issue) under 35 U.S.C. §154(b)(1).
The patents-at-issue are directed to "power saws with a safety feature that instantly stops the saw blade upon contact with flesh." Slip op. at 3. The Federal Circuit noted that "issuance of [the patents-at-issue] was delayed by appeals before allowance." Id. As such, SawStop Holdings LLC (Sawstop) sought a patent term adjustment under §154(b)(1)(C).
Under the provisions of §154(b)(1)(C), the PTO can grant a patent term adjustment if "the issue of an original patent is delayed due to … (iii) appellate review by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board or by a Federal court in a case in which the patent was issued under a decision in the review reversing an adverse determination of patentability." Id. at 2-3. In these circumstances, the patent term is extended one day for each day of the pendency of the proceeding, order, or review of the patent.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.