Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On Sept. 14, 2022, a Federal Circuit panel of Judges Newman, Linn, and Chen issued a unanimous decision in Sawstop Holding LLC v. Vidal, No. 2021-1537 (Fed. Cir. 2022). The Federal Circuit affirmed the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia's grant of summary judgment in favor of the United States Patent and Trademark Office's (PTO) decision to refuse to award an additional patent term adjustment for U.S. Patent No. 9,522,476 (the '476 patent) and U.S. Patent No. 9,927,796 (the '796 patent and collectively, the patents-at-issue) under 35 U.S.C. §154(b)(1).
The patents-at-issue are directed to "power saws with a safety feature that instantly stops the saw blade upon contact with flesh." Slip op. at 3. The Federal Circuit noted that "issuance of [the patents-at-issue] was delayed by appeals before allowance." Id. As such, SawStop Holdings LLC (Sawstop) sought a patent term adjustment under §154(b)(1)(C).
Under the provisions of §154(b)(1)(C), the PTO can grant a patent term adjustment if "the issue of an original patent is delayed due to … (iii) appellate review by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board or by a Federal court in a case in which the patent was issued under a decision in the review reversing an adverse determination of patentability." Id. at 2-3. In these circumstances, the patent term is extended one day for each day of the pendency of the proceeding, order, or review of the patent.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.
This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.
For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.
In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.
Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.