Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Second Circuit Addresses Significant Music Compulsory Licensing Issues In Bill Graham Archives Dispute

By Stan Soocher
November 01, 2022

In 2015, a group of music publishers sued the purchaser of the Bill Graham Archives — a repository that includes live performances staged by the late, legendary concert promoter of an array of musical artists beginning in the 1960s. In their lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, the publishers alleged the defendants were streaming and offering downloads of Graham Archives concerts without having obtained proper licenses for 197 of the plaintiffs' musical compositions. The publishers sought maximum statutory damages of $150,000 for each song infringed and a permanent injunction.

Among the significant issues raised by the case, the archive defendants claimed in response that §115 of the U.S. Copyright Act — which provides that once a song is published, other parties can and should obtain a "compulsory license" that allows them "to make and distribute phonorecords" of the published song — applied to the archived video recordings of the concerts. ("Phonorecords" are defined in §101 as "material objects in which sounds, other than those accompanying a motion picture of other audiovisual work, are fixed … The term 'phonorecords' includes the material object in which the sounds are first fixed.")

The archive defendants also argued they weren't required to meet substantive requirements of §115 for the 51 concert audio recordings in dispute in the litigation.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.