Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In 2015, a group of music publishers sued the purchaser of the Bill Graham Archives — a repository that includes live performances staged by the late, legendary concert promoter of an array of musical artists beginning in the 1960s. In their lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, the publishers alleged the defendants were streaming and offering downloads of Graham Archives concerts without having obtained proper licenses for 197 of the plaintiffs' musical compositions. The publishers sought maximum statutory damages of $150,000 for each song infringed and a permanent injunction.
Among the significant issues raised by the case, the archive defendants claimed in response that §115 of the U.S. Copyright Act — which provides that once a song is published, other parties can and should obtain a "compulsory license" that allows them "to make and distribute phonorecords" of the published song — applied to the archived video recordings of the concerts. ("Phonorecords" are defined in §101 as "material objects in which sounds, other than those accompanying a motion picture of other audiovisual work, are fixed … The term 'phonorecords' includes the material object in which the sounds are first fixed.")
The archive defendants also argued they weren't required to meet substantive requirements of §115 for the 51 concert audio recordings in dispute in the litigation.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.